CONTRIBUTORS
- Agastya Sharma Laimayum
- Nur Izzah Binte Mohamad Iskandar
- Kalaivani D/O Regupathy
- Mayang Sari Binte Noorhezam
- Elaine Teo
References
1 Chua, A. (2014). NLB pulls two children’s books that ‘don’t promote family values’. [online] TODAY. Available at: https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/nlb-pulls-two-childrens-books-dont-promote-family-values [Accessed 30 Mar. 2026].
2 It is after an image of three tiger hunters, two squatting and one standing with a rifle, posing with a dead tiger by the roadside at Choa Chu Kang Village.
3 ‘Romance on Hobby Horses’, is a series of work that have been shown in exhibitions like "The Spatial, The Ephemeral, And The Possibility Of It All" at Art Commune Gallery in 2023.
Bibliography
- Boo, S.Y. (2025). The Gate Remains: Politics, Play, and Painting Across Time.
- Boo, S.Y. (2020). Boo Sze Yang. [online] Boo Sze Yang. Available at: https://www.booszeyang.com/ [Accessed 20 Feb. 2026].
- Lee, C.M. ed., (2023). 17 children’s titles reclassified for covering topics related to race, religion and sexuality: NLB. [online] CNA. Available at: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/nlb-17-children-titles-higher-age-groups-race-religion-sexuality-lgbtq-mci-3262926 [Accessed 23 Feb. 2026].
- NLB (n.d.). Three Tiger Hunters, 1930. [Photograph] NLB website. Available at: https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/image-detail?cmsuuid=dc6cb21a-c53e-4498-b1c9-2f3475884260#:~:text=Information%20About,Title%20devised%20by%20Library%20staff. [Accessed 20 Feb. 2026].
- Boo, S.Y. (2025). The Gate Remains: Politics, Play, and Painting Across Time.
The Gate Remains: Politics, Play, and Painting Across Time
“How does my work represent me and as someone that lives in Singapore?”
- Boo Sze Yang, 2025
“You need to struggle because that will give you content in your art.”
- Boo Sze Yang, 2025
In the heart of Singapore’s landscape, Boo Sze Yang (b. 1965) paints the mundane with a sense of haunting intensity. As a Singaporean contemporary artist, he transforms the everyday, ordinary objects, and political viewpoints into reflections of the human condition and the world we live in now. Rather than offering straightforward messages to his audience, Boo’s paintings stage a slow, uneasy contemplation of collective memory, authority, and existential disquiet. His practice can be understood as a sustained attempt to paint the emotional atmosphere of a rapidly changing society through the material language of oil on canvas.
The question posed in the epigraph by Boo has served as a turning point for Boo while he was doing his studies in the United Kingdom, at Chelsea College of Art & Design, University of the Arts London, when one of his professors commented that his work did not represent his identity and self. The criticism forced Boo to revise the course of his practice. He was challenged with the idea that without the artist’s presence, the work risks a lack of personality. In turn, he chose to abandon his much earlier works and start afresh by vigorously trying new ways to incorporate himself into his paintings. This shift set the stage for a practice deeply tied to the struggles and lived experiences.
Building on this realisation, the subjects that Boo paints are carried out as objects and spaces with which he experiences resistance. If a subject gives him nothing to say, he does not paint it. He intentionally creates paintings that are unsettling, inviting the viewers to sense an underlying tension and challenging them to question what they are seeing. In doing so, he encourages viewers to work though uncertainty with their experience with the paintings. His approach to the process shows how much he values resistance. Boo’s practice is grounded in the duality of intentional and unintentional actions in the art-making process. According to him, his approach is a negotiation between intended and unintended marks, in which errors and flaws are not removed, but rather embraced as agents of meaning. His practice serves as a counter space in which accidents are viewed as a source of creativity and surprise, in a society that typically associates the unintentional with mistakes.
This belief can be closely aligned to the way he thinks about the role of art in society. Citing a quote by Cesar A. Cruz, a Mexican poet and academic, “Art should comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable”, Boo positions his paintings as tools for reflection rather than resolution. At first, humour teases the viewer, providing minor hints or jokes, yet beneath that surface lies a more serious invitation: to think, to imagine, and to face the contradictions of the present moment. Even in his abstract work, Boo does not provide answers, but rather presents the artist as a questioner, someone who opens up ambiguity, inviting viewers to use their imagination. Boo has talked of his previous paintings, which were primarily grey, reflecting on his focus on uncertainty, doubt and the in-between. As time passed, however, he gradually understood that colour could be used to capture the sophistication of human emotion and lived experiences. This change in palette echoed the expansion of his practice in theme, from a quiet tension to more political and theatrical scenes.
It is in this context that The Gatekeepers can be viewed as one of the central themes of Boo’s ongoing engagement with authority, control, and observation across time.
The Gatekeepers (Dialogue and others series, 2014)
Boo Sze Yang’s earlier works, such as The Gatekeepers from the Dialogue & Others series (2014), are characteristic of a practice defined by a gestural, almost improvisational approach anticipating the materiality of paint. His expressive brushwork emphasises process and surface, allowing the physical act of painting to remain visible. The Gatekeepers (2014) was based on the controversy that arose in Singapore in 2014 surrounding the children's book "And Tango Makes Three". The National Library Board removed the book from its shelves due to its portrayal of two male penguins raising a chick, which was considered contradictory to the country's "pro-family" social norms1.
Drawing reference from a 1930 photograph2 (fig. 2), Boo replaced the tiger in the original image with penguins, using substitution as a strategy to provoke reflection on censorship, moral guardianship, and the regulation of social values. In this case, the “gatekeeper” is not as much an individual but a system of institutional control that determines what can be seen, read, and authorised.
The Gatekeepers (Romance on Hobby Horse, 2023)
Almost 10 years later, The Gatekeepers (2023), as part of the Romance of Hobby Horse series3, returns to the theme of guarded approach, now presented in a planned or dramatic way. The work explores the performative nature of power within today’s spectacle-driven society. Boo uses irony and exaggeration in making stage-like compositions that are related to propaganda posters. Suited figures are shown on the toy horses as though they are in a parade, set against a vivid rose-coloured background. Though their poses suggest authority and command, their guns and steeds are toys. Gas masks hide their identities and intentions, blurring the lines between civilian and oppressor. The painting transforms danger into a spectacle, where violence is stylised, and made absurd.
In this recent work, power is depicted as rehearsed and replicable: performed for the camera, in which spectacle forms belief. The painting questions how authority is staged in public life and consumed through media, reflecting a reality in which conflict is mediated through screens and symbols. If the 2014 Gatekeepers quietly exposes the moral gatekeeping embedded in state and institutional decisions, the 2023 Gatekeepers amplifies these concerns into a display of satire, pageantry, and threat.
Conclusion
The two paintings were painted nine years apart, though they coincidentally share the same title, The Gatekeepers. This coincidence emphasizes on the existence of the gatekeepers in society where people and institutions are entrusted with maintaining boundaries and preserving order which is presented in various ways throughout time. Gatekeeping is still prevalent, whether it is in the 2014 debate over a children’s book and social conventions, or in broader political unrest and mediated spectacle. Although the appearance of authority may change, the process of guarding, controlling, and shaping public perception stays.
Boo Sze Yang’s practice demonstrates how painting can be a site of inquiry into identity, power and the politics of daily life. His refusal to a defined style, his willingness to struggle, and openness to live ambiguously make his work a constant process of becoming. Boo’s paintings do not instruct viewers on what to think. It challenges them to question how power is staged, who has the authority to decide what is acceptable, and how “gatekeeping” continues to shape the society in Singapore.
When seen collectively, these works by Boo Sze Yang reveal how personal struggle, experimentation, and political awareness feature in an ongoing inquiry about who holds the gate and at what cost. The repetition of the title also reflects how structures of control continually reappear in different guises, shaped by time, politics, and media. From the grey ambiguities of his earlier paintings to the vivid theatrics of his recent series, he uses humour, substitution, and instability to disturb the viewer’s connection to power, representation, and belief. In doing so, Boo does not resolve the conflicts he depicts; instead, he leaves the gate slightly ajar, inviting viewers to step into the discomfort of not knowing, recognising their own role within the systems that include, exclude, and define what can be seen.