CONTRIBUTORS

  • Agastya Sharma Laimayum
  • Nur Izzah Binte Mohamad Iskandar
  • Kalaivani D/O Regupathy
  • Mayang Sari Binte Noorhezam
  • Elaine Teo

References

Baldwin, K. et al. (no date) U.S. Agricultural Policy Review, 2022, U.S. Agricultural Policy Review, 2022 | Economic Research Service. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=107774. ISAAA. 2019. Global Status of Commercialised Biotech/GM Crops: 2019.

ISAAA Brief No. 55. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.

Program, H.F. (no date) How gmos are regulated, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2024. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/how-gmos-are-regulated-united-states.

Food as Material History: Everyday Ingredients as Political Carriers

For Chuyia Chia, food serves as a political and historical substance even before it appears in her performances. She affirms that, “Material for me is very important. It is a statement in itself. So the history of the material you are using, it tells the whole story.” Her process begins with the understanding that ingredients are embedded within systems of land use, labour, belief, and class relations. She selects materials through personal proximity, using direct experience with food to reveal its broader social roles. Food is therefore never neutral; it carries memory, identity, agriculture, and ideology prior to any artistic intervention. Following the three interrelated trajectories in Chia’s practice: geography, where food is shaped by land and upbringing; soybeans, which reveal the entanglement of global agriculture and biopolitics; and material case studies such as leeks, which register class and fragility. These strands show that her performances do not assign meaning to materials; instead, they bring into visibility the political conditions already inscribed within them.

Geography

This sensitivity to origin is grounded in Chia’s upbringing in Selangor, Malaysia, where she lived in a fishing village structured by self-sufficiency. Food was not decorative but essential, where both sustenance and identity were. Daily life involved cultivating vegetables and fishing directly from the surrounding environment, embedding food production within routine labour. Fish were cleaned and processed by hand, and vegetables were grown locally, while even childhood play drew from shells and leaves gathered nearby. In this context, food functioned as infrastructure, shaped by scarcity, labour, and communal reliance on land and water. Later, while living in Sweden, Chia encountered a different relationship to food, where one was framed as an ecological choice rather than a necessity. Community gardening plots, forest culture, and rainwater collection reflected a society oriented towards sustainability as a conscious practice. This contrast sharpened her understanding that food always reflects how a community relates to land: whether through subsistence, industrialisation, or ecological awareness. These geographic conditions become foundational in her work, in which ingredients are treated as carriers of place-based histories rather than as neutral materials.

Soybean and GMO

Soybean begins as memory before it becomes politics. Chia describes how soy-based foods, such as soy sauce, soybean sprouts, and tofu, were everyday staples in her upbringing. Growing up with her grandmother, who observed a monthly vegetarian diet, soy became a recurring source of nourishment. Through this repetition, soybean was not simply an ingredient but part of a lived routine, embedded in cultural practice, care, and proximity to the body. This familiarity later shifts when she becomes aware of the industrial conditions surrounding soybean production. She notes that a vast majority of global soybean crops are genetically modified, raising concerns about how such interventions might affect the body, particularly in relation to pesticide traces such as glyphosate found in everyday food products (Chia, interview transcript). While regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration maintain that approved GMO crops are safe for consumption (FDA, 2024), ongoing debate persists over their long-term ecological and health effects. For Chia, this tension is not resolved scientifically but experienced bodily, prompting what she describes as a sense of unease, questioning whether what is consumed daily might “bring consequences to our body.” Rather than developing into a singular artwork, soybean reveals how Chia approaches food as material. It demonstrates her tendency to begin with ingredients that are culturally familiar and geographically grounded, before tracing their transformation through larger agricultural and industrial systems. Here, food becomes a site where domestic memory, urban consumption, and global production intersect, collapsing the distance between land and body. This framework, focusing on proximity to awareness, to material investigation, extends into her performance practice. While soybean itself remains a conceptual anchor, it informs how she later works with other ingredients, such as leeks, where these concerns become materially and visually articulated through processes of handling, transformation, and decay.

Leek and Performance

Leeks demonstrate this logic through both class and fragility. Chia describes it as “a very nutritious and warm-hearted soup” suited for cold seasons. The ingredients used are easy to cook, “cosy and warm,” and accessible across society. “It’s a food that is at every level in society that everyone can enjoy.” In contrast to other luxury ingredients codified to reflect more elitist associations, leeks signify shared nourishment. By choosing it, she emphasises that “food is for everybody,” positioning it against food hierarchy and status-related modes of consumption.

Yet leeks also carry another history: vulnerability. Through repeated experimentation within her practice, she discovered that once rehydrated, dried leaves “can rot very easily” and become “much more fragile.” When sewn or manipulated, they break apart. In her performance and material processes, leeks are cut, opened, dried, and reworked into delicate, unstable forms that resist permanence and require continuous care, preservation strategies, and structural adjustment. This instability is not a technical inconvenience; it is the material truth of organic matter.

At the same time, intimate handling reveals unexpected beauty. When opened carefully, the leek becomes translucent, almost jade-like. This reinforces her insistence that meaning emerges through proximity: “you see in real, you touch it in real.” Political materiality is inseparable from sensory contact. Leeks, therefore, carry class equality and ecological fragility simultaneously, as both social signifier and unstable material.

If leeks uncover social structure, so-called “power foods” reveal the ideologies behind governing bodies. Chia notes that these vegetables (such as broccoli, beetroot, and wheatgrass) are believed in some contexts to help fight illness or boost immunity. Her focus, however, is not their nutritional value but the cultural beliefs and associations attached to them. She questions whether these beliefs are “real or… a myth,” showing how food enters systems of longing and optimisation.

In her artistic practices, these materials are not presented as fixed symbols but are activated through handling, preparation, and transformation. Through these actions, Chia examines how dietary narratives shape perceptions of health, positioning food as a carrier of bodily ideology prior to its framing as art.

Everyday Practice as Research

Chia resists identifying as an activist, instead framing her work as an ongoing investigation into environmental responsibility and relational systems between body, food, and land. Her practice extends beyond singular performances into cycles of use, decay, and return. Because food decomposes, it re-enters ecological systems through reuse, redistribution, or composting; this process is not incidental but integral to the work’s ethics. Across her engagement with leeks, soybeans, and other ingredients, Chia’s critical inquiry materialises through repetition. Cooking, preparing, handling, and documenting food become continuous acts of research. She treats daily behaviours as performative structures: actions repeated without attention remain invisible, but once observed, they reveal patterns of habit, labour, and care. Through constant documentation, such as photographing, filming, and revisiting gestures, she builds an archive of repetition in which meaning emerges over time rather than from singular events. Her artworks, therefore, do not culminate in fixed objects but in ongoing processes. The preparation of food, the handling of fragile materials, and the return of organic matter to ecological cycles all function as extensions of the work. In this framework, everyday life becomes both method and site of inquiry. Across geography, leeks, soybeans, and ecological cycles, Chuyia Chia demonstrates that ingredients operate as political carriers long before performance activates them. Food contains class structures, bodily beliefs, industrial systems, and environmental relations. Her practice does not transform food into metaphor; instead, it reveals that these materials were already historical, already infrastructural, and already political.